Recent Blog Posts
Can Acts of Disorderly Conduct be Committed Online?
U.S. News recently reportedthat a Chicago middle schooler was charged with disorderly conduct and a hate crime after posting a video on social media. Allegedly, the video in question was threatening in nature and was removed from the Internet after a parent reported it to the Marlowe Middle School and the police got involved.
When we think of acts of disorderly conduct we often think of someone inciting a riot, peeping through a window, or fighting in public. Rarely do we think of disorderly conduct as a crime that can be committed online. Nevertheless, some states, including Illinois, recognize disorderly conduct as a crime that can be committed either in person or remotely.
Illinois’ Disorderly Conduct Statute
Under code section 720 ILCS 5/26-1, an individual can commit the crime of disorderly conduct in a number of different ways including, including the following:
Crimes Against the Elderly Carry Increased Penalties in Illinois
A man accused of committing a series of crimes on both sides of the Illinois-Indiana border is facing various charges for which, if convicted, he will likely receive increased penalties because he targeted the elderly during his crime spree. The Chicago Sun Times reports that the alleged offender is being held in jail on multiple charges of sexual assault, burglary, unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon, and burglary resulting in bodily harm. The victims of these alleged crimes were predominantly elderly men and women and included a 97-year-old-woman and a 73-year-old man who were robbed outside of their home, and an 81-year-old woman who was robbed and sexually assaulted, among others.
Crimes Against the Elderly
Under Illinois law, crimes committed against the elderly (or the disabled) are considered to be more morally egregious than those committed against other people, and therefore are often punished more severely. In fact, when a crime is committed in Illinois against an elderly adult, the maximum prison sentence permissible for the crime committed can be extended. In some instances,prison sentences are doubled.
Sentencing in Illinois Criminal Cases: Aggravating and Mitigating Factors
After a criminal defendant in Illinois is found guilty of committing a crime, or pleads no contest, a judge will evaluate the facts surrounding the case and then sentence the offender. While making this determination the judge also takes into account relevant mitigating factors (i.e. factors that support imposing a lesser penalty) and aggravating factors(i.e. factors that support imposing a harsher penalty).
Mitigating Factors
Under code section 730 ILCS 5/5-5-3.1 of the Illinois Compiled Statutes, judges in Illinois are required to consider the following mitigating factors when determining an offender’s sentence:
- The offender’s criminal conduct did not cause, or threaten, serious physical harm to another,
- The offender did not consider that his or her conduct would cause or threaten serious physical harm to another,
More Than a Ticket: Aggravated Speeding in Illinois
Many drivers view the occasional traffic ticket as no big deal. The fine associated with a citation is often seen as just one of the costs of driving, albeit one the driver could do without. If this describes your perspective when you get a ticket, you may be inclined to simply plead guilty by paying the fine and moving on with your life. In some cases, such an approach may be reasonable, but certain traffic violations are much more serious and may even be prosecuted as criminal offenses. Aggravated speeding, for example, could lead to a criminal conviction and possibly time in jail.
Petty Offenses vs. Criminal Offenses
Most traffic violations are classified by the state of Illinois as petty offenses. It is also possible for a driver to be cited for violating local traffic ordinances. Local violations and petty offenses are punishable by fines ranging up to $1,000. Petty offenses also accumulate points on the driver’s record which could lead to suspension of his or her driving privileges. Criminal offenses, by comparison, are handled in the state’s criminal court system and may result in more expensive fines, probation, and jail time. Traffic-related criminal offenses are generally misdemeanors, but there are some-including aggravated DUI-that could be considered felonies.
Will a 15-Year-Old Illinois Teen Accused of Murder be Tried as an Adult?
In Illinois, we have a juvenile justice system that handles most criminal offenses involving minors (i.e. individuals who are less than 18 years old) and a separate justice system that adjudicates criminal cases involving adult defendants. However, under some limited circumstances a judge will decide that a particular minor should be tried as an adult and will transferhis or her case out of the juvenile system and into the adult system. This is exactly what may happen to a 15-year-old Illinois teen accused of committing first-degree murder.
KWQC TV6 reports that the girl turned 15 just three days before she allegedly murdered her mother. Under Illinois state law a minor who has been charged with first-degree murder will not havehis or her case automatically transferred into adult court ifhe or she isless than 16 years old; however, the possibility of being tried as an adult is still not off the table for Ms. Schroeder.
Understanding State and Federal Racketeering Laws
If you or a family member is facing criminal charges of racketeering, take action now and retain the services of an experienced racketeering defense attorney.Racketeering is a very serious crime that, upon conviction, can have life-altering consequences.
If convicted, you will be ordered to spend years in prison, pay substantial sums of money in fines, have mandatory probation, lose your constitutional rights (e.g., ability to vote), lose your personal assets, and you will beordered to provide financial restitution to any victims.
Overview of Racketeering
Racketeering is typically used as shorthand to describe the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”). Congress enacted this law in 1970. It is typically used in instances of alleged organized crime where businesses, known as “rackets,” utilize legitimate organizations for the purpose of embezzling funds. Though, this federal law covers a wide array of crimes, more than 25 to be exact.
Understanding the Ramifications of Refusing a Breathalyzer Test in Illinois
If you or a family member is pulled over, should you consent to taking a breathalyzer test? This is a common question and, in truth, the answer is-it depends. This is because each case is different and your circumstances may have presented a scenario where refusing a Breathalyzer test was appropriate, or vice versa.
Under Illinois Law, when you obtain a driver’s license you are impliedly consenting to take a Breathalyzer test if you are requested by a police officer to do so. This implied consent is codified in state statute 625 ILCS 40/5-7.1.
Even with the existence of an implied consent law, you have the right to refuse a Breathalyzer test, but the ramifications can be quite severe. For example, if you are convicted of a DUI and you refused to take a breathalyzer test, then your driver’s license will be suspended for at least one year.
Strategies for Prevailing in Your DUI Case
Getting convicted of a DUI carries significant ramifications that may adversely affect you for years. A DUI conviction is typically a Class A misdemeanor, meaning you could be ordered to serve up to one year in jail. You could also be required to pay a fine of up to $2,500 with a mandatory minimum fine of $500. In addition, your driver’s license will be suspended for at least one year. And this is all for a first-time offender.
If you have prior DUI convictions on your record, the penalties are even more severe. For example, if this is your third DUI conviction, the charge escalates to a Class 2 felonywhich means you could be ordered to spend between three and seven years in jail. Also, your driver’s license will be suspended for at least 10 years.
Ways to Prevail Against the Government
If you are charged with a DUI, do not presume that you are going to be found guilty. There are many ways to challenge a DUI charge. For example, your Rolling Meadows DUI defense attorney can investigate whether the police officer who pulled you over followed all proper and necessary protocols and procedures when handling your charges.
Two New Devices in Battle Against Texting While Driving
By now, virtually everyone knows that using a cell phone or other mobile device to send text messages or emails while driving is extremely dangerous. It also against the law in most states. If you are cited for texting while driving in Illinois, fines start at $75 for a first offense and go up from there. Thanks to two new pieces of technological innovation, however, it may soon be more difficult for drivers to text while behind the wheel but easier for the police to know that drivers have been texting.
Limits for Teen Drivers
Derive Systems, a company that specializes in automotive technology, says that it will be releasing a new device in 2018 that limits what a driver can do while driving. According to company officials, the Derive Teen Driver plugs into the vehicle’s diagnostic port and makes logic adjustments to the car’s computer. The device can be set-ostensibly by parents-to limit the vehicle’s speed, to prevent the car from starting if the driver is not wearing a seatbelt, and even to lock and disable the driver’s cell phone.
Governor Signs New DUI Law
The Governor of Illinois signed a new piece of legislation into law that alters the way police handle an arrest of someone under the age of 21 who is suspected of being intoxicated.
Senate Bill 2185, most commonly referred to as “Conor’s Law” requires that when a police officer arrests someone showing signs of being intoxicated who is under the age of 21,he or she must make a reasonable attempt to contact a responsible adult who can take custody of the individual. If police cannot locate a parent, guardian, family member, or friend, the arrested individual has the right take a breathalyzer test or other chemical test to prove thathe or she isbelow the legal limit of 0.08. The results of these tests are now prohibited from being used in a prosecution against the person placed under arrest.
The new law, which goes into effect in June 2018, enables police to detain someone under the age of 21 untilhe or she sobers up or, as mentioned, police can locate a responsible adult to come pick up the individual, according to WAND17.


